There are various methods and tools that officials can use to determine the speed in Virginia. These instruments include RADAR and LIDAR, both of which the Court considers to be very precise.
RADAR and LIDAR are not on the table because they are considered to be very precise. A police officer can prove in court that his equipment was properly calibrated before the event, and the court considers the readings he gives to be reliable and correct. The way an officer demonstrates accuracy is based on a calibration certificate provided for the equipment. If police officers fail to bring the certificate to court for any reason, or if it is incomplete or contains false information, Newport News lawyers who commit speeding have the right to exclude their client from the case.
Sometimes lawyers can be able to get a police officer to admit that the device may have locked on the wrong object. This can happen when there is heavy traffic or when the officer is in a position where it is not easy to fire a direct shot at a vehicle. It’s very difficult to prove that in court.
In some cases, officials track the speed of vehicles using a method known as speed. In other words, they “track” the speed of the vehicle using a method known as “speed.”
Here, a police officer follows a vehicle to determine how fast it is driving, adjusting the speed of the vehicle and looking at its own speedometer to “determine” the speed of the target vehicle, which in turn is “speeding.” This pace is a bit controversial because it’s a situation where it’s really the officer’s word against the other person. ‘ S.S. The official’s own speedometer may be switched off, and if the official cannot specify it, it is possible that the results of the speed measurement may be completely disregarded. If it can be proved that an officer is gaining speed and does not fully agree with the driver, then there is no defense.